Chief Curator | Aleksandra Selivanova
Section Curators
Space Course | Anna Bokova, Stanislav Gromik
Department of Architecture | Anna Bokova, Ilya Lapin
Department of Printing and Graphic Arts, Graphic Course | Rustam Gabbasov
Department of Textile Design, Department of Ceramics | Ksenia Guseva
Department of Painting | Nadya Plungyan
Department of Sculpture, Volume Course | Maria Silina
Department of Wood and Metalworking | Alyona Sokolnikova
Color Course | Darya Sorokina
Scientific Consultants | Larisa Ivanova-Veen, Tatyana Lysova
Exhibition Architecture | Sergey Nebotov
Design | Anastasia Yarullina, Anna Skrzhinskaya
Lighting Design | Alyona Osina
Reconstructions and Models
Department of Architecture | Ivan Ermolaev, Alexander Kuzmin, and students from The Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture (The Cooper Union, New York): Cichen Wu, Dusung Shin, Inxiao Chen, Sally Chen, under the guidance of Anna Bokova
Department of Sculpture and Volume Course | Led by Mark Yesin: Yulia Volobrinskaya, Mikhail Gubinsky, Elizaveta Guseva, Arman Nadjaryan, Ivan Orlov, Anastasia Fabritskaya
Department of Painting | Evgenia Rzheznikova
Department of Wood and Metalworking | Anton Ketov, Alexander Lavrentyev
Furniture Reconstruction Supervisor | Alyona Sokolnikova
Experts and Consultants | Alexander Semyonov, Sergey Kulikov
Collaborations
Students of the British Higher School of Art and Design (BHSAD) | Anna Bochkareva, Maria Gratz, Anastasia Napalkova, Ekaterina Tarasova, Anna Teleri, Marina Yurieva
Design Zavod | Olga Dianova, Pavel Menyailov
Stameska | Evgeny Nazarov
LumoLumo | Kirill Oleinik
In 2020, VHUTEMAS celebrated its centenary, marking 100 years since the founding of the most groundbreaking and influential art and design school in Russia. For a decade, from 1920 to 1930, the workshops on Myasnitskaya and Rozhdestvenka Streets were home to the most dynamic artistic forces in Moscow—painters, graphic artists, architects, sculptors, and designers, all shaping the future of Soviet art and industry.
The sheer intensity of ideas, manifestos, and creative energy within this small space was so powerful that its echo is still felt today. Yet, unlike its well-documented counterpart, BAUHAUS, the full impact of VHUTEMAS remains underexplored. A long period of suppression of the avant-garde legacy, combined with the loss and destruction of student archives, has left many gaps. In recent years, books and exhibitions have gradually reconstructed individual faculties, educators, and students, but this exhibition was the first to bring them all together, with a special focus on student work and the teaching methodology itself.
The exhibition aimed to show this educational "explosion" in motion, tracing the transition from the pre-revolutionary art school to the Free State Studios (1918−1920), then to VHUTEMAS (1920−1927), VHUTEIN (1927−1930), and ultimately to contemporary design education.
We call VHUTEMAS a "School of the Avant-garde", not simply for its formal connections to Futurism, Constructivism, or Suprematism, but because of its radically innovative approach to teaching. At its core was the formal-analytical method, which was equally integral to the diametrically opposed workshops of Alexander Rodchenko and Vladimir Favorsky, Ilya Mashkov and David Shterenberg.
The pedagogy of VHUTEMAS focused on breaking down complex artistic problems into fundamental elements, teaching students analysis, independent thinking, and experimentation rather than imitation. The propaedeutic (foundation) courses introduced students to the "alphabet" of art—composition, rhythm, color, form, space, volume, and graphics—creating a true revolution in artistic education. The radical merging of artistic, industrial, and scientific disciplines, along with material and technical research, produced a new type of artist-designer, capable of solving both artistic and applied challenges.
Reflecting the spirit of collectivism that defined VHUTEMAS, this exhibition was created by a large team of curators and contributors. Each faculty and discipline was curated by a specialist who defined the key ideas and principles of their section. A unified visual system for identifying faculty heads and workshop leaders allowed visitors to trace connections between different methodologies and the fluid boundaries between disciplines.